Chat List Topic Archives

Floating Ghost April 1997
 

SPECIAL NOTE; AS OF 9-14-01 THESE ARCHIVES HAVE BEEN UPDATED WITH THE MOST RECENT POSTS ON THIS INCLUDED HERE FIRST WITH THE 1996 / 1997 POSTS LATER.

X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X

 


 Subject: Hall: $8 FG MOTOR - GOOD Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 16:26:08 +0000
From: "Ron Tye"
 Reply-To: chatlist
 To: chatlist@WildRice.com Hi Kids, I finaly got one of $8 FG motors I
mensiond last week. Hooked it up and ran it for 6 hours. It's strong enough for
any thing but a heavy FG. I can stop the motor by grabing the shaft with a pair
of pliers (but it's not easy to do). It's very quiet. It runs warm (155 deg F.)
You have to add your own power cord. The output shaft is round with a small hole
drilled through it. The output shaft does not stick up as high as the top of the
motor. Side view of motor Please view in a fixed-width font such as Courier.
Motor Shaft +-------+ +--+ | | |0 | | | | | | | +------+--+-------+-------++ |
Gear box | +--------------------------- 120 VAC, 60 Hz, .26 A. 9 RPM. Overall
size: 4-3/4" (W) x 2-3/8" (H) x 2-1/8" (D).Shaft size: 9/16"
(L) x 5/16" (dia.). MFG: MOLON Manufacturer Part Number: SGM-2508-2 MECI
Part Number: 420-9289 Price: $7.95 The company selling them is MECI They have a
$4 handeling charge and (I believe) a $20 minimum order They said they have
about 125 of them http://www.meci.com 1-800-344-4465 Ron AKA Samurai Haunter

 
 

 Subject: Re: Hall: $8 FG MOTOR - GOOD Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:12:44 -0700
From: "Alden Pelayo"
 Reply-To: chatlist
 To: chatlist
 References: 1 About how heavy would be too heavy for it? ----- Original Message
----- From: Ron Tye
 To:
 Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 9:26 AM Subject: Hall: $8 FG MOTOR - GOOD
> Hi Kids, > > I finaly got one of $8 FG motors I mensiond last week.
Hooked it up and ran > it for 6 hours. > > It's strong enough for any
thing but a heavy FG. I can stop the motor by > grabing the shaft with a
pair of pliers (but it's not easy to do). > > It's very quiet. > >
It runs warm (155 deg F.) > > You have to add your own power cord. >
> The output shaft is round with a small hole drilled through it. The output
> shaft does not stick up as high as the top of the motor. > > Side
view of motor > > Please view in a fixed-width > font such as Courier.
> > Motor > Shaft +-------+ > +--+ | | > |0 | | | > | | | |
> +------+--+-------+-------++ > | Gear box | >
+--------------------------- > > > 120 VAC, 60 Hz, .26 A. 9 RPM.
Overall size: 4-3/4" (W) x 2-3/8" (H) x 2-1/8" > (D).Shaft
size: 9/16" (L) x 5/16" (dia.). > MFG: MOLON > Manufacturer Part
Number: SGM-2508-2 > MECI Part Number: 420-9289 > Price: $7.95 > >
The company selling them is MECI > They have a $4 handeling charge and (I
believe) a $20 minimum order > They said they have about 125 of them >
http://www.meci.com > 1-800-344-4465 > > > Ron > AKA Samurai
Haunter > > > > > >


Subject: Re: Hall: $8 FG MOTOR - GOOD Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 17:15:03 +0000
From: "Ron Tye"
 Reply-To: chatlist
 To: chatlist@WildRice.com It should handel any ghost made from the
"standard" materials (cheese cloth, wig head, coat hanger, laytex
hands, etc). Any ghostly looking ghost (light, etherial, translosent, floating)
should work just fine. Ron AKA Samurai Haunter >From: "Alden
Pelayo"
 >Reply-To: chatlist
 >To: chatlist
 >Subject: Re: Hall: $8 FG MOTOR - GOOD >Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:12:44
-0700 > >About how heavy would be too heavy for it? > > >-----
Original Message ----- >From: Ron Tye
 >To:
 >Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 9:26 AM >Subject: Hall: $8 FG MOTOR -
GOOD > > > > Hi Kids, > > > > I finaly got one of $8 FG
motors I mensiond last week. Hooked it up and >ran > > it for 6 hours.
> > > > It's strong enough for any thing but a heavy FG. I can stop
the motor >by > > grabing the shaft with a pair of pliers (but it's not
easy to do). > > > > It's very quiet. > > > > It runs
warm (155 deg F.) > > > > You have to add your own power cord. >
> > > The output shaft is round with a small hole drilled through it.
The >output > > shaft does not stick up as high as the top of the
motor. > > > > Side view of motor > > > > Please view in
a fixed-width > > font such as Courier. > > > > Motor >
> Shaft +-------+ > > +--+ | | > > |0 | | | > > | | | |
> > +------+--+-------+-------++ > > | Gear box | > >
+--------------------------- > > > > > > 120 VAC, 60 Hz, .26
A. 9 RPM. Overall size: 4-3/4" (W) x 2-3/8" (H) x >2-1/8" >
> (D).Shaft size: 9/16" (L) x 5/16" (dia.). > > MFG: MOLON
> > Manufacturer Part Number: SGM-2508-2 > > MECI Part Number:
420-9289 > > Price: $7.95 > > > > The company selling them is
MECI > > They have a $4 handeling charge and (I believe) a $20 minimum
order > > They said they have about 125 of them > >
http://www.meci.com > > 1-800-344-4465 > > > > > > Ron
> > AKA Samurai Haunter > > > >

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx1996 / 1997xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 Subject:
Floating Ghost Date: Thu, 03 Apr 1997 12:48:03 -0800 From: Death Lord
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com 'Ween List
--HELP--. I sent this post out a couple of days ago, but fear Doug Ferguson is
no longer with us. I mean with the list! Perhaps he is, but just not responding.
So, in light of this, I would really appreciate any help from the numerous
techno-minds out there. I am sure that I'm not the only one on the list that has
wanted to construct one of these, and I would like to do the talking version if
it isn't too far above my head. I'm working on one of the Floating Ghosts. First off, let me send out my praises To Doug for creating this great
event. If it turns out as nice as I think it will, the effect should be
major-haunt quality. I also appreciate all the work he's gone through to offer
these instructions to the list and web at large. I have a few questions, and
probably will have even more before I get the thing finished. Please understand
up front that I am still learning the dynamic functioning of forks and spoons at
this point, so my questions may shock and amaze you. 1) Can you suggest the best
place to locate the pullies for the hands and head? 2)I decided I was a moron
this morning while I was in Radio Shark trying to buy the necessary ingredients
for the LED eyes and such. Do you have any further insights for the
electronically brain-dead? When I asked the girl at the shark what these items
were that were called out in the instructions, she looked at me like I had three
eyes. Of course, I DO have three eyes, but she couldn't help me anyway. Let's
say for brevity I wanted to make the ghost version that talks. A) Which type
trim pot should I get? (This is the trim pot for the line into the L.E.D. eyes.)
They offer two different ones in 10K ohms. (Probably more, the sales girl was
even more of an idiot than I usually am.) B) Would I use the head-phones-out on
a boom box for the power to this? If so how do I know its 8-ohm? And is this an
idiotic question (for all I know, all stereos and boom boxes are 8 ohm)? Perhaps
the question is best summed up as; What do I best use as the amplifier to this?
B-1)Which leads coming from the boom box or amp should I use? C) What does a
70v. speaker system transformer do? And how can I identify whether I need a 70v
or not? (This is in line between the amp and the trim pot that runs to the
L.E.D.eyes.)Or is this the only v rating made? D) What type or size of speaker
should be used for this, or does that really matter much? E) Is this a typo
where you call for a six-foot long wire to be soldered to the short lead and
then to the long lead of the other? If not, why six feet long? Does this have to
do with impedence? And what size wire should be used? Solid or multi-wire? f) On
the wild chance that I actually get this entire setup working without the help
of Nasa engineers, How do I get the voice of the ghost to cue itself back up for
the following event session? 
 Wil --
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces Death Lord
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Subject: Re: Floating Ghost
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 1997 20:53:05 -0600 (CST) From: DWFWW@jazz.ucc.uno.edu
Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com I'm not gone, I'm
just snowed doing other work! :-/ If anyone needs me, I'll offer my phone number
to anyone who writes me OFF LIST. I'm really sorry I haven't been participating,
but I'm involved in a lot of non-halloween related web stuff, like helping folks
with pages and doing custom graphics. I'll do my best to get involved again
soon, but I may be unable to post for several days at a time. A good way to
reach me by e-mail is: orniske@aol.com as I use AOL's flash during the day to
get my mail automatically. I don't check this account as often. -Doug Subject:
Dayton Gear Motors VS Road Runner Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 22:32:20 -0700 From:
Death Lord
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com I couldn't find
Doug Ferguson's address, (its on my computer at work) so I'll post this to the
group. I know many of you have made the Floating Ghost of Doug's. He
recommends using a Dayton gear motor that runs at precisely 6 RPM. I need to
know if a motor that rates in at 4.5 times the horsepower as the Dayton, but at
10 RPM would work as well. If this is simply too fast, could I rheostat (sp?)
this down safely? I found two of these for only $20 each, so I got them both.
I'm hoping they'll work. If any of you has any information regarding the Floating Ghost, I would be GRAVELY appreciative for your input. i.e. What luck have any
of you had using various motors? Also, by using such a powerful motor, would
the counter balance still be needed for this? Thanks in advance.
Wil --
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces.
The Death Lord
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Subject: Re: Dayton Gear Motors VS
Road Runner Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 01:40:52 -0500 From: "John P.
Jeffries"
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com Wil, Many motors
are rated at inch-ounces of torque. (Correct me if I'm wrong here Denny) But to
get an idea of the power of one inch-ounce of torque: One inch-ounce= 1 ounce 1
inch from the shaft. 4 in-ounce= one ounce 4 inches from the shaft, etc, etc.
Now that might not sound like much until you find a motor with 25 inch-ounces of
torque. I have not built the FG, but the RPM would seem more important than the
torque. (Hence the counter weight for "unearthly" movement.) >
Also, by using such a powerfull motor, would >the counter balance still be
needed for this? John ********************************* * Mr.Scary Productions *
* http://www.mrscary.com * * E-mail: mrscary@kiva.net * * 1-812-824-8935 * *
FAX: 1-812-824-9960 * ********************************* Subject: Re: Dayton Gear
Motors VS Road Runner Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 11:53:32 -0500 (CDT) From:
DWFWW@jazz.ucc.uno.edu Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To:
chatlist@netcom.com John wrote: >I have not built the FG, but the RPM
would seem more important than the torque. It is in this case, yes. The best
FG's run slowly...quite slowly. And that counterweight is very important. The
counterweight should be opposite the heaviest thing on the FC rig, whether it's
the ghost's head, or some other flown object. In the case of a ghost marionette,
the arms counterbalance each other. If your motor labors, ans slows, you're
going to be in trouble eventually, because one spot on the final gear is going
to wear prematurely, and the motor will probably run hot. -Doug

Subject:
Re: Dayton Gear Motors VS Road Runner Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 11:27:17 -0700
From: Wil
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com References: >the
motor will probably run hot. > > -Doug Then do you think that 10 rpm is
too fast? I bought this from a motor repair and rebuilder that uses these type
motors for small tasks, and after looking up the specs for the Dayton for me, he
told me this was almost 5 times the torque as the Dayton. He felt it may be
possible to use a house light dimmer switch to slow this somewhat safely, since
it had this much power, but wasn't positive how much life I'd get out of it if I
needed it slower than 10 rpm. I humbly cast mt questions at the feet of the FG
creator for his immenent wisdom. (Or any other techie that knows about such
things.) -- X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces Death
Lord http://www.deathlord.net

X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Subject: Re: Dayton Gear Motors VS
Road Runner Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 19:49:49 -0700 From: Brian Rich
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com Organization: Santa Barbara Science To:
chatlist@netcom.com References: 1 Death Lord wrote: [regarding the Floating Ghost motor] >I need to know if a motor that rates in at 4.5 > times
the horsepower as the Dayton, but at 10 RPM would work as well. A 10 RPM motor
would go through one arm-waving cycle in 6 seconds, vs. a 10 second cycle using
the Dayton motor. It doesn't seem like much of a difference to me. (I watched a
sweep-second hand on a clock while trying to imagine the ghost). Whether or not
the speed of the motor can be reduced using a rheostat or other type of
electronic speed control would depend on what type of motor it is. A good place
to buy surplus geared reduction motors is C&H Sales in Glendale, CA. --
Brian Wesley Rich -------------------------------------------------
http://www.west.net/~science/ Subject: Re: L.E.D.s Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997
17:20:55 -0700 From: Wil Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To:
chatlist@netcom.com References: 1 Lund wrote: > > Ref Wil's question.
> be wired AC to DC as I was using 12 VDC batteries like crasy, works great.
> > Larry Sorry I'm not following too well. Did you use part of your
garage door motor or electrical on your FG? I thought that the power that runs
the lights for the eyes on the FG was the radio frequency of the voice sound
coming from the amp. If its not, I feel really stupid. Of course, not as stupid
as I would as if I blew up everything I've scrounged up to make my ghost over
the past five weeks! Thanks Larry. --
Wil
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces Death Lord '97 Topic
Archives- http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Subject: Re: The First Semi-Annual
Southern California Halloweenaholics Gettogether and Creatathon Date: Mon, 28
Apr 1997 23:12:00 -0700 From: Death Lord
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com Michael Marcrum
wrote: You will know more than you ever thought possible before > this is
over. I hope you all have a great gathering...the northern > meeting was a
real starting point for some great works ahead. > Kathy > the new kid on
the crypt > mmarcrum@ix.netcom.com Kathy, I have, to a great extent,
completed my Floating Ghost. The last to do is painting the fabric and face.
But the effect of this is startling. So feminine and flowing. Gives me the
creeps thinking the thing is floating right now in the darkness of my garage,
its so effective. The reason I mention all this is obviously not to convince you
to make one. I know that is in store for you and a few others next month during
your No.Cal. workshop. The reason is to strongly suggest the sound and lighted
eyes. If you need Radio Shark part numbers and such, I can help. But this is one
event that I think should be done justice at all costs. This is a major haunt
event if done right. Also, the recommendations in the instructions offer some
advice that I think I would choose not to follow completely myself though. Like
the throw of the crank arm itself. I shortened it a bit after seeing the rise
and fall from 14" to 12 1/2". The recommended distance is between
14" and 18". You can play with it yourself if you'd like, but if I
made another one, I'd probably go with no more than 10" or 11". The
being floating up higher as it moves is more imposing than when it is lower and
closer to the floor. Not only this, but by using a shorter crank you can have a
longer robe, which gives your ghost a much more "real" and elegant
look, since its not going so far toward the floor. I did use a wig form for the
face as suggested, (even though I was planning on making this a skeleton ghost
with a light-weight plastic face mask.) which offers a startlingly female face
to this that really compliments the slow and gracefull movements. I'm really
glad now that I did decide to try the wig form. I've decided to entirely scrapp
the idea of the skeleton effect now. I have decided to recommend to the Southern
California Halloweenaholics to make one of these at the opening meeting. I can't
be more sold on this project. I will however recommend that those choosing to
make one for themselves at the meeting to do some preparatory work before the
actual workshop. This baby takes some real time to construct from scratch, and I
am convinced that it could not be done in six hours by someone that has never
made one before. (Or anyone else for that matter. At least, not like the one I
made.) (I will be reiterating this for the So. Cal.'aholics later. This is only
in the event the No.Cal. group is interested in a few tips.) The things I would
recommend to be done in advance to the workshop: 1) Make your wire marionette.
The simple wire form of this lady takes a surprising amount of time to get it
right. And it has to be right to even work. If the joints aren't arranged
cleanly it can bind up. And even if the skeleton winds up needing corrective
surgery at the workshop, at least the bulk of time to create its armature
is already invested. I added breasts to mine (okay ladies, let me have it for
this distastefull comment) since I don't care for the robe to just hang straight
down from the thin wire shoulders. This added depth to the torso. (In fact you
can't even tell there were breasts added at all, just depth. Which means I
really HAVE to make them LARGER. ;~> ) 2) Attach the wig form to the
skeleton. Just cut the back half off the head to lighten the weight unless yours
will be seen from the sides. If you decide to use the glue as
recommended,(Tacky) this needs to be dry to mess with the skeleton and the cords
attaching it to the crank. I ran the coat-hanger wire entirely up to the top of
the head to the cord for a secure attachment. Half way up the back of the head I
added an additional horizontal wire to the main line going up, and flattened it
out to each side of the head to run screws through for attachment. I chose to
use aggressive-thread drywall screws through the wire and into the now-flat back
of the head. This made it secure instantly without waiting for glue to dry, and
is much stronger and more secure. 3) Make sure your u-clamp is the right one to
fit the shaft of the motor you have chosen. This sounds like a small point, yet
one that caused me two special trips to the hardware store. If folks choose to
use other than the Dayton gear motor, the shafts can be differing sizes so
rather than hope one size fits, check this out in advance. This would stop the
whole thing in its tracks. I chose to use a used Merkle-Korff 1915-A gear motor
I picked up for $20.00 at the local electric motor repair shop. He said he comes
across these pretty regularly and had two at the time I went in, so I picked
them both up. (He said that people use these for Christmas displays.) The speed
is 10 rpm instead of the suggested 6, but the ghost looks to travel at a very
nice rate. The upside, besides saving $50.00, is that the Merkle has nearly
three times the power as the Dayton motor, and is actually two motors in one.
The one motor is for forward, and the entirely separate drive is for reverse. If
the one motor ever burns out, you only need to plug in the other lead and you
have a new motor. So far I haven't added the counter-balance weight to my ghost
at all, since it works fine without it. After I play with it more, I may decide
to add this later as a life-extender. I also wouldn't recommend using the
rotisserie (sp?) motor, since the shaft will only fall out on the ground once
inverted. Further notes; The sound and lights can be added at any time to this,
so if you didn't actually have time to install this feature during the workshop,
you may want to at least try to solder one working model together as an example
for everyone present to view. This was the part that caused me many hours of
research. To have had a working example in front of me would have saved me at
least three days. The marionette cord; I tried the thin nylon line just as
everyone would naturally use for this. Thin, strong, tough. However. It doesn't
work with 1/2" pullies. The crank goes 'round, and as the line is pulled
from one side of the pully to the other, it slips right out of the groove and
drops into the space between the pully and the pully housing. It gets caught and
tears itself up. What DOES work though is parachute cord. This can be purchased
for $6.00 for 100 feet at the local Army surplus store in BLACK that is
invisible under Black Light, and will probably still be like new when Christ
returns. This stuff is the definition of tough and the diameter is perfect for
the 1/2" pully. Instead of tying a knot in the cord at the ends I used
tie-wire to make a clean attachment to fishing-line clips that normally go to a
lure. This allows the ghost to be removed for storage later. You will find it
takes about 54" per line needed for the marionette and 80" or so for
the counter-balance if the Dayton motor is used, so figure 20 ft per FG. The
Black Light; Recommended in the intructions: 12". I suggest perhaps even an
18" . The faint look that the 12" light will give, I feel, may not
have quite the impact that the larger one will. Of course, this may be added
later on at anytime, the same as the L.E.D. eyes and sound. There is little
reason to risk transporting one of these to and from the workshop just to
install it there. The board; Recommended in the instructions: 48" square.
Actually needed if the crank is 10" to 14": 39" x 42" (which
allows plenty of room to attach the blacklight to the front of the board also.
The location of the motor is not really needed at the center of a 48"
square board, but rather 15" from the pully that controlls the head. The
attachment I used that works perfectly is the head pully centered from each
side, 4" from the back of the board. Measure 15" inches further
forward (19" overall from the back of the board) for the center of the
motor. Then 10" further forward (29" from the back) for the pullies
that controll the arms. These two pullies are 1" in from the sides of the
board, or 40" apart. So, since the arm pullies aren't fully at the front of
the board, you need not have all the excess weight of the wood up front. Allow
1" or so in front of the crank's furtherst throw and attach your black
light. I hope this wasn't a waste of everyone's time. I wanted to share what
I've learned the hard way, so others wouldn't have to go through the same. The
instructions so graciously shared on the Fantasmechanics homepage (I temporarily
do not have the URL for this but can forward upon request) are very in-depth
already on this project, and of the highest caliber. Its just I felt these may
be slight enhancements to an already wonderfull set of plans. I hope that you
all have a great time next month and feel free to e mail me if you have further
technical questions I may help with.
Wil --
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces. The Death Lord
http://www.deathlord.net

X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Subject: Re: The First Semi-Annual
Southern California Halloweenaholics Gettogether and Creatathon Date: Tue, 29
Apr 1997 09:59:31 -0700 From: Wil
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com References: 1 , 2
Michael Marcrum wrote: > > Wil, > thanks for all the notes and details
of your building of the Crank > Ghost. I will see what the others think, but
I do like the idea of > having the body and head set to go so that we can
work on the mechanical > together. > In our haunt we are planning on using
the eyes...but not the voice. We > have a wonderful tape of a graveyard that
we use!! and the ghost would > not be heard over it. > As for the
"Breasts" remark...You are right that it would add more > volume to
the body!! I can't wait to start playing with material and all > the good
stuff. I was wondering what those clear plastic masks that > people wear over
their faces to distort them, makes them look like > plastic dolls..wonder if
that would work over the foam head to give a > strange human look?? >
Thanks for the help. > Kathy > the new kid on the crypt >
mmarcrum@ix.netcom.com Too late. You asked a question and that means an answer
now..... Since I did the clothing and fluorescent painting last night, perhaps I
can offer this. The gauze that is recommended for the clothing is right on the
money. I recommend doing this as apposed to the bed sheets you see in the pics
on the net. Once the fabric is hit with even the very slightest amount of
flourecent paint it causes the fabric to become very visible. Anything denser in
weave would spoil the apparitional look of the ghost dramatically IMHO. I took
two sheets of cheescloth used by painters and sewed them together to create one
large piece of fabric. Then I simply draped this over the back of the head and
body and fastened it to the wig form with 2 little pieces of thin wire bent into
staples. This sounds really simple, but if you did this, you would see that the
very nature of the lady demands that the clothing be flowing and unobstructed
for the dramatic travel it goes through. You may be able to enhance the
appearance in limited amount by sewing an actual costume, but the cheesecloth
drapes so effortlessly I think you wouldn't be able to tell there was anything
more than draping fabric. Here's another thing that became apparent while on the
line of speaking about the sewing of the fabric; the joining of the fabric
together creates a dense line that is very noticeable under b-light, distracting
from the overall effect. If you can get a single, large sheet about the size of
a king size bed sheet, that would work beautifully. In Doug's instructions he
recommends to do the fluorescent painting of the apparition in the dark under
black light. This is a must! What I learned in 30 minutes under the black light
with the paint is amazing. I recommend to do your painting of the wig form in
tiny sections at first to get the effect of what is happening to the face. I
liked what black paint did for me for blood and definition on the face far more
than flour. paint. As far as the "plastic skin" mask, you may want to
fool around with it. I thought all along before making mine that I would be
using a mask over the wigform for the effect I wanted, but after 1/2 hour of
fiddling, I wouldn't cover up the realistic look of the painted face. This is
scary realistic when done right. Just be carefull applying your paint. All the
paint I used on my wig form ate into the styrofoam like an acid. But the effect
under the blacklight is enhanced by this. I went for a semi-rotting dead effect
on mine and the cancer-like effect from the paint was perfect. One more thing on
this. Doug says to use blue fluorescent paint with the green in a mix. Since I
couldn't find blue fluorescent paint I played with white spray paint and the
effect under the b-light was a beautiful purple that lent itself perfectly to
compliment the green. White, black and fluorescent green is all that's needed to
do it justice. Sorry to hear that you're not planning the sound. The effect she
gives while hovering is spooky. The effect she gives while hovering and also
going from black eyes to red "talking" eyes with the voice coming from
her could make the unsuspecting wet their pants. With every word she says, her
eyes rise to life and die. Its a cold, death-like effect. I am going to have
thunder rolling on non-stop loop along with a "spooky halloween
sounds" cd at the same time, but with her voice just audible over all this,
I expect the effect to really add to the mix a great deal. I might just mention
one other upside to the sound, and that is that the power source for the eyes
and the choreography of the blink is taken care of with the little
radio/cassette player that's sending this message. My wife noted that the
breasts I added to her skeleton gave her a fullness about the upper torso that
makes the thing much more real than the FG examples shown with just the coat
hanger only. Too bad that this is all it offers. If you were to make them more
prominent than the one I made has you could give the apparition an almost lusty
or sexy effect which would add even more to the effect she gives. If I make
another Floating Ghost for any reason in the future, I'll make the breasts
about 6" of portusion as apposed to the approx. 4" this one has. The
reason I don't change this one now is because I like my finished product too
much to tear it apart and take any chances with it! I am planning to video tape
it for the JB Corn video swap mentioned last night. I hope the video camera can
capture in the low light setting properly. Well, you asked! --
Wil
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces Death Lord '97 Topic
Archives- http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
(Note from the editor: Doug was
very helpfull in the construction hints on this. He offered his home number for
me, and walked me through the smallest details. I thank Doug for his wonderful
help and commend him for an event that is much nicer in real life than can be
justly described in print. - Death Lord) Subject: Re: Blacklites Date: Sun, 11
May 1997 15:34:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Spookyfx@aol.com Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com In a message dated 97-05-10
19:32:30 EDT, you write: << mention all this because I use 150 pound test
Kevlar thread under 30 (was 25 at first) pounds of constant tension, the longest
run between wheels is 80 feet if I remember right. I've not been able to find a
way to carry more than a pound total with this system. I try to keep my ghost at
11 to 12 oz. for best results. At around 40 pounds line tension the bicycle
wheel axles start to yield at the threads. The >> Hi Denny Thanks, I had
not thought of "glow" paint and "absorbing" station’s
along the path! Great system! but I am confused about the problem at 40 pounds.
I know there is a difference but can you explain! Why would a bike rim that can
hold 60 pounds (120 pound person divide by two wheels) fail under these
conditions? What do you mean the threads failed? Maybe we are using a different
attachment system as far as the "bolt" and "bracket are
concerned? I have used a crude tension test system to try the brackets and the
wheel and I have not had a problem so far! What is it I don’t know about this?
I have not attached the ghost yet as I am looking for the self contained system
I mentioned. But please let me know If I am about to destroy my work so far...
What do you think? jerry
Subject: Re: Blacklites/Floating Ghost/boring Date: Sun,
11 May 1997 19:47:12 -0500 From: milwiron@btprod.com Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com At 03:34 PM 5/11/97 -0400, you
wrote: >In a message dated 97-05-10 19:32:30 EDT, you write: >
><< mention all this because I use 150 pound test Kevlar thread under
30 >> (was 25 at first) pounds of constant tension, the longest run
between wheels >> is 80 feet if I remember right. I've not been able to
find a way to carry >> more than a pound total with this system. I try to
keep my ghost at 11 to >> 12 oz. for best results. At around 40 pounds
line tension the bicycle wheel >> axles start to yield at the threads.
>Hi Denny >Thanks, I had not thought of "glow" paint and
"absorbing" station's along the >path! Great system! but I am
confused about the problem at 40 pounds. >I know there is a difference but
can you explain! >Why would a bike rim >that can hold 60 pounds (120 pound
person divide by two wheels) >fail under these conditions? On a bicycle
you're holding both sides of the axle, the axle is seeing only shear. Try
holding an axle by one end only by mounting it to the outside of one of the
bicycle's forks, what kind of forces is it seeing now besides shear? Now try the
same experiment by extending the axle 3 inches or so. >Maybe we are using a
different attachment system as far as the >"bolt" and "bracket
are concerned? Very possibly. I mixed rear and front axles in my system, rears
are usually much stronger. My brackets are "L" unistrut bolted into
"U" sections throughout, they'll support a few hundred pounds easily.
The axles are the weak link with high tension. If you can support both ends of
the axles, you can have much higher line tension. In my system the ghost travels
around each of the wheels so I can support only one end. >I have used a crude
tension test system to try the brackets >and the wheel and I have not had a
problem so far! If your line tension will carry the weight of your ghost and
your axles don't bend, you've got it made. At 30 pounds line tension, I also
experience what I would consider premature line wear, requiring line replacement
after 50% loss (eyeballed) in various areas. I would guess my running time to be
40 hours at 30 pounds tension and 80 hours at 25 pounds tension. 150 pound test,
.025 dia. Kevlar thread was the best I could find. You may very well have found
better thread to use. Just out of curiosity, what is your actual measured line
tension? Denny Subject: Re: MOTORIZED pop up ghost Date: Sat, 17 May 1997
00:23:49 -0600 (CST) From: DWFWW@jazz.ucc.uno.edu Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com I hope this isn't too
obvious.... If you build a FG rig, and include the FG in your scene, the
rising and falling skull can be operated by a 'take-off' line from the
countweight pulley. It will take a small amount of barnyard engineering to
figure out how to do this for your application, but you'll have two effects for
the price of one. If you don't want the FG in the scene with the rising/falling
skull, locate the FG in a scene separated by a backwall, and use the motor
platform to run both effects. -Doug F.\

 


Subject:
Re: FG Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 22:33:47 -0400 From: Silvia
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com References: 1
Thanks for the input on my FG idea, admit it, it sounded cool! I was thinking
of not having the head move but that's part of the illusion. As far as a flying
crank projector, I think that would be a little tricky. I did mess a little with
the crank arm. I started at about 20" but it seemed to strain the motor a
little. I ended up at around 17" it worked best for me. Next question! I
wanted my FG to have an almost white glow under black light. Can anyone suggest
a good paint and source. I read how people painted their houses with woolite to
get a glow. Would it be possible to soak my FG's frock in woolite for a glow?
always thinking Chris Subject: Re: FG Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 21:39:43 -0500
From: DJ

 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com References: 1 , 2
Chris asked: > Would it be possible to soak my FG's frock in woolite for a
glow? We dipped our FG's frock in liquid Tide detergent. It glowed a very eerie
pale blue to bluish-white color. It worked quite nicely. DJ, who really will get
those pictures scanned and posted someday Subject: Re: MOTORIZED pop up ghost
Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 10:11:09 -0400 From: John Wohlers
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com At 12:23 AM 5/17/97
-0600, you wrote: > >I hope this isn't too obvious.... > >If you
build a FG rig, and include the FG in your scene, the rising and >falling
skull can be operated by a 'take-off' line from the countweight >pulley. It
will take a small amount of barnyard engineering to figure out >how to do
this for your application, but you'll have two effects for the >price of one.
If you don't want the FG in the scene with the rising/falling >skull, locate
the FG in a scene separated by a backwall, and use the motor >platform to
run both effects. > This idea works very well, I used it this past halloween
to cause the candle in my jack-o-lantern to float up and out of the jack, only
to float back down a few seconds later. The two effects were seperated by a wall
and no-one suspected (at leaset that I head) that the two effects were at all
related. >-Doug F. Subject: Re: Job stuff Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 09:39:12
-0700 From: Bob Andrews
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com References: 1 , 2 ,
3 , 4 , 5 Michael Marcrum wrote: > > Hey Bob, > this has been a good
week for you. > 1. the new neighbor likes Halloween > 2. you have a
running FG > 3. You have a JOB!! No kidding, Kathy! > > Now if you
could do something about the other group..you would be fine. > Have you
planned how you are dressing your ghost?? We are going to work > on our
tonight and see if we can get it dressed! > Kathy Mine is going to be covered
in the whispy bridal veil material of which I bought 60 yards. Lightly basted in
blue and green fluorescent paint, and slowly illuminated under a black light
fixture. Mmmmmm, mmmmmmm! -- Bob Andrews bandrews@inreach.com
http://www.anaserve.com/~BoBandrews Subject: Re: FG Date: Wed, 21 May 1997
00:40:25 -0600 (CST) From: DWFWW@jazz.ucc.uno.edu Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com Chris wrote: >thinking of
trying to project an animated face onto a moving FG. Gosh! Even a nut like me
wouldn't try to synchronize a projector to\ a moving marionette! Gee...I'm
thinking on the fly here... Nahhh, trust me, the flashing eyes are enough. My
neighbors, who saw my minature FG/Pepper's Ghost illusion, thought the flashing
eyes with the words worked. I spoke with a repesentative from Gilderfluke (the
company Disney now buys animatronic controllers from) at the IAAPA show, and he
told me, in effect: Keep it simple. Reduce moving parts to a minimum. Suggestion
is worth as much as the actual thing. To add a moving mouth to the FG would
cost youu more than the effect is worth, and frankly, it would reduce the
mystery of the thing. In short: The eyes have it. ;-) -Doug


Subject:
Re: FG Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 19:22:44 -0700 From: mramius@dreamsys.com
Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com IN>Chris wrote:
IN>>thinking of trying to project an animated face onto a moving FG.
IN>Gosh! Even a nut like me wouldn't try to synchronize a projector to\
IN>a moving marionette! Gee...I'm thinking on the fly here... IN>Nahhh,
trust me, the flashing eyes are enough. My neighbors, who saw my IN>minature
FG/Pepper's Ghost illusion, thought the flashing eyes with the IN>words
worked. I spoke with a repesentative from Gilderfluke (the company IN>Disney
now buys animatronic controllers from) at the IAAPA show, and he IN>told me,
in effect: Keep it simple. Reduce moving parts to a minimum. IN>Suggestion is
worth as much as the actual thing. IN>To add a moving mouth to the FG would
cost youu more than the effect is IN>worth, and frankly, it would reduce the
mystery of the thing. IN>In short: The eyes have it. ;-) IN>-Doug I
agree with you, Doug... but if you REALLY wanted to have an FG with a face, is
it conceiveable(sp?) to have a small projector on-board? perhaps underneath....?
Marko [ Sent From: Dreamscape Systems - dreamsys.com ] [ Location: Van Nuys, CA
- (818) 781-7529 ] Subject: Re: Another FG question? Date: Wed, 21 May 1997
23:18:10 -0500 From: beverlyc@telapex.com (BEVERLY CLARK) Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com To:



 What if you put a black light in a box so that no light would show.If you then
cut a hole in the box and covered the hole with a flat sheet of clear
plastic,spray paint 1/2 of the plastic sheet black,and mount it on a slow
turning motor,like the one used for the FG,it might give the fading in and out
look.Think of a clear record turning on turntable or a color wheel used to light
a xmas tree. If the box is placed under the FG it should make the FG
materialize as the clear side of the wheel makes a pass over the hole. Think it
will work?- > From: Jason Christman
 > To: chatlist@netcom.com > Subject: Re: Another FG question? >
Date: Wednesday, May 21, 1997 9:33 PM > > >I was thinking of using all
black for my FG and covering it in woolite or > >some other detergent
that would glow in BL. Has anyone tried this? would > >fading in and out
BL make the ghost materialize and d materialize (?). > > > >Chris
> > > > > > > > > I dunno about the woolite, but I
was thinking about doing this myself, so > tell me if it looks good :)
Anyway,... Blacklights take a few seconds to > come on, so you can't fade
them in and out...anybody ever figured out a way > to make a FG
materialize...??? > > > Jason, the ghoulie newbie Subject: Re: Northern
Calif. meeting Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 21:31:10 -0700 From: JOE & MICHELLE
BOLDT
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com References: 1 , 2 ,
3 , 4 wil@wilschock.com wrote: > > > So for anyone in the southern area
that is not signed up yet for the > > meeting down there...DO IT!! It
really helps to get together and > > exchange ideas. > > And
Wil...when you say needing supplies is important...here are a few > >
things that some of us forgot...screws, line, and camera (that being me) >
> Kathy > > the new kid on the crypt > > mmarcrum@ix.netcom.com
> > I didn't want to mention this before hand, but I am going to make sure
> all the perphirals are in place for everyone, just in case. I buy screws
> by the ten thousand and have purchased enought fender washers and >
miniture wire rings to make 30 FG. I also have about 90 feet of cord > left
over from mine. I am still recomending that everyone pick these > things up,
but keeping the things around just in case the wrong sized > items are
brought along. I figured this would be the case! > > Kathy, I forgot to
ask, what motors and crank lengths did you decide to > use? Also, did anyone
put together the color organ LED eyes? One more > thing, if those that built
the FG at your workshop built their own > skeleton before arriving, how did
they differ in size, looks, etc? > > -- > Wil >
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X >
Rest In Pieces > Death Lord
> '97 chatlist Topic Archives; >
http://www.deathlord.net >
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Hey Wil oops i mean Death Lord,
when i first thought of making a FG i thought cool but after making it i say
WAY COOL!!!!. I used a wooden dowel about the thickness of my pinkey and as wide
as my shoulders as the main suport because i didn't want to take any chances of
collapsing when i put the material as the gown on and the weight of the skull
and skeleton hands. When this ghost starts to move i can sit and watch it for
hours! Bob the mold man got the Dayton brand motors mike marcrum brought the
alluminium stock about 1 inch x 18 in lengh, we put a twist about two inches
from one end and mounted it to the motor shaft using u- clamps, the FG turned
out so cool i'm going to have to make another one. talk to you later, Joe the
morbid one! Subject: Re: Another FG question? Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 22:33:32
-0400 From: Jason Christman
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com >I was thinking
of using all black for my FG and covering it in woolite or >some other
detergent that would glow in BL. Has anyone tried this? would >fading in and
out BL make the ghost materialize and d materialize (?). > >Chris >
> > > I dunno about the woolite, but I was thinking about doing this
myself, so tell me if it looks good :) Anyway,... Blacklights take a few seconds
to come on, so you can't fade them in and out...anybody ever figured out a way
to make a FG materialize...??? Jason, the ghoulie newbie Subject: Re: Another
FG question? Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 23:00:17 -0600 (CST) From:
DWFWW@jazz.ucc.uno.edu Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To:
chatlist@netcom.com >anybody ever figured out a way to make a FG
materialize...??? Go to the phanmech website and read in detail about the Hotel
Lugosi. The shutter system I use is a hinged flap that covers the blacklight
gradually as it closes. It is motor driven (guess which gearmotor ;-) ) and
there are limit switches to detect opened and closed. The circuit and mechaincal
diagcylinder are available on the site. -Doug


Subject:
Re: FG Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 22:57:15 -0600 (CST) From: DWFWW@jazz.ucc.uno.edu
Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com >is it
conceiveable(sp?) to have a small projector on-board? Yes... it surely is, but
you'd really have to miniaturize the unit, or the ghost might have such a deep
and heavy head as to make things impractical. Perhaps you might try a
translucent face, with the 'projector' being a small, intense light source
behind a thin metal gobo with slots cut to project eyes and a mouth (or a
negative of this.) Just a thought, and don't use a hot light source. ;-) -Doug
Subject: Re: Another FG question? Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 10:37:38 -0400
 From:
Jim Kadel
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com At 11:18 PM 5/21/97
-0500, BEVERLY CLARK wrote: >What if you put a black light in a box so that
no light would show.If you >then cut a hole in the box and covered the hole
with a flat sheet of >clear plastic,spray paint 1/2 of the plastic sheet
black,and mount it on a >slow turning motor,like the one used for the FG,it
might give the fading >in and out look...snip Off the top of my head [which I
consider far better than the mouth part], I'd wonder if: You could use the SAME
motor as moves FG itself to obtain this effect? Place a plastic semi-circular
(180 deg.) window into the motor mount base (above the ghost). Mount a black
lite above this window and attach to the crank arm a [minimum = 180 deg]
shutter. A larger [degree] shutter would keep the ghost invisible longer.
----------------------- Commenting on making the ghost "black", and
painting it with UV glow material: I've found with black lite it usually looks
better to have a material glow from within. I'd utilize the "glow
thru" effect. Subject: Re: Motor for FG Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 08:05:49
-0700 From: Carl Cowley
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com References: 1 , 2 ,
3 , 4 , 5 I found the Dayton motor (2Z806) in the Grainger catalog for $40.90.
Are those of you who have built the FG getting a better price for this motor
somewhere else? Subject: Re: Motor for FG Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 09:02:15 -0700
From: Bob Andrews
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com References: 1 , 2 ,
3 , 4 , 5 , 6 Carl Cowley wrote: > > I found the Dayton motor (2Z806) in
the Grainger catalog for $40.90. > Are those of you who have built the FG
getting a better price for this > motor somewhere else? Carl, The motors we
used were Dayton motors (2Z807) which is 12 RPM instead of 6 RPM. I work accross
the street from Graingers, but they and every other Grainger within 100 miles
were out of the 6RPM motor. We paid 40.90 for them. (plus tax) -- Bob Andrews
bandrews@inreach.com http://www.anaserve.com/~BoBandrews Subject: Re: Motor for
FG Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 10:48:52 -0700 From: Carl Cowley
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com References: 1 , 2 ,
3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 Bob Andrews wrote: > The motors we used were Dayton motors
(2Z807) which is 12 RPM instead > of 6 RPM. I work accross the street from
Graingers, but they and every > other Grainger within 100 miles were out of
the 6RPM motor. We paid > 40.90 for them. (plus tax) > -- > Bob Andrews
> bandrews@inreach.com > http://www.anaserve.com/~BoBandrews If you've
seen both, did you like the effect of the 12 RPM motor better than the 6 RPM?
Thanks for you input on this. I can't wait to build one these gadgets!
Subject:
Re: Northern Calif. meeting Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 08:16:33 -0700 (PDT) From:
Don Bertino
 Reply-To: chatlist@netcom.com To: chatlist@netcom.com On Wed, 21 May
1997, wil@wilschock.com wrote: > > So for anyone in the southern area that
is not signed up yet for the > > meeting down there...DO IT!! It really
helps to get together and > > exchange ideas. > > And Wil...when you
say needing supplies is important...here are a few > > things that some of
us forgot...screws, line, and camera (that being me) > > I didn't want to
mention this before hand, but I am going to make sure > all the perphirals
are in place for everyone, just in case. I buy screws > by the ten thousand
and have purchased enought fender washers and > miniture wire rings to make
30 FG. I also have about 90 feet of cord > left over from mine. I am still
recomending that everyone pick these > things up, but keeping the things
around just in case the wrong sized > items are brought along. I figured this
would be the case! The Grainger motor in question need 4 1" 10/32 bolts and
washers (1/4") for mounting. That motor needs 3/8" U-bolt. The motor's
do not have cords so we cut off the ends of some cheap extention cords for that.
The pivot was made with 1 3/4" of running threads (1/4"), four nuts,
one lock washer and five 1/4" washers, besides the fender washer/pivot. It
was lot's of fun! > Kathy, I forgot to ask, what motors and crank lengths did
you decide to > use? Also, did anyone put together the color organ LED eyes?
One more > thing, if those that built the FG at your workshop built their
own > skeleton before arriving, how did they differ in size, looks, etc? I'm
not Kathy but... Skeleton's should be made before hand, or not. We went with a
18 1/2" crank but additional holes can be drilled and the pivot moved for
individual taste. don bertino@netcom.com


Subject:
Re: Books -Reply
Date:
Fri, 23 May 1997 13:25:32 -0700
From:
Michael Marcrum
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


> Dave "Hi. I'm Dave and I'm a Techno-Dummy" Kiihne
> daveki@nebfef.com
>
Hi Dave,
Is this group hug time??? I will remember you when I publish ;-)!
I have to say that I could not really see the FG in my head. And when
we arrived at Don's for the meeting he had a tape. Well I was sold the
minute I saw on in real action. We are even going to make some smaller
ones to run some bats!!
Kathy
the new kid on the crypt
mmarcrum@ix.netcom.com

Subject:
Re: Northern Calif. meeting
Date:
Fri, 23 May 1997 22:07:51 -0700
From:
JOE & MICHELLE BOLDT
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6


wil@wilschock.com wrote:
>
> > Hey Wil oops i mean Death Lord, when i first thought of making a FG i
> > thought cool but after making it i say WAY COOL!!!!. I used a wooden
> > dowel about the thickness of my pinkey and as wide as my shoulders as
> > the main suport because i didn't want to take any chances of collapsing
> > when i put the material as the gown on and the weight of the skull and
> > skeleton hands. When this ghost starts to move i can sit and watch it
> > for hours! Bob the mold man got the Dayton brand motors mike marcrum
> > brought the alluminium stock about 1 inch x 18 in lengh, we put a twist
> > about two inches from one end and mounted it to the motor shaft using u-
> > clamps, the FG turned out so cool i'm going to have to make another
> > one. talk to you later, Joe the morbid one!
>
> That's exactly the response this ghost got out of me too. I thought it
> was a great event in theory, but when I hooked up the sound and eyes and
> got the fluorescent paint right, she is astonishing. I don't plan to
> make another due to the limited space, but I wish I had room for a gagle
> of them fying together in the same room. What a ghostly image that would
> be. As far as the length of the crank, I felt that the 13" crank offered
> me a better effect for her than the longer one. You may want to
> experiment with this yourself. She doesn't fly so far down toward the
> ground, therefore allowing a longer robe. This gives her a "real"
> life-sized appearance. And the distance she flies is more than enough at
> that.
>
> Using the Dayton motor, did you all find it necessary to use the counter
> weight such as Doug advises? And if so, is this a nuisance? I used a
> different motor that doesn't require this, but I realise not everyone
> will be able to find the Merkle-Korff. I need to be ready to set up this
> counter weight at the workshop June 22nd.
>
> --
> Wil
> X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
> Rest In Pieces
> Death Lord
> '97 chatlist Topic Archives;
> http://www.deathlord.net
> X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
We opted not to use a counter weight and my skeleton flys perfectly, we
just mounted the pully to the skeletons head (which will be hidden from
the gown) and tied the string to a nail at the back of the
plywood. Joe, the morbid one!



Subject:
Radio Scatt
Date:
Sat, 14 Jun 1997 14:18:04 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
CC:
jeyster@juno.com, 104221.2540@compuserve.com, jrbaas@loop.com


I have the part numbers for the making the color-organ eyes that go to
the Floating Ghost. First off, I appologize for not having the trim
pot number, I guess the package got lost!

Trim Pot---ask Doug Ferguson.

LED EYES (2) NO#276-041 T-1 3/4 size

Line Transformers (2) NO#32-1031B 70 VOLT 10 WATT

Connectors for
quick disconnect (1) NO#274-249a THREE CONDUCTOR 1/8" PHONE JACK
(1) NO#274-286a TWO CONDUCTOR 1/8" PHONE PLUG
            
--
Wil
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces
Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X


Subject:
Elvira the Gorgeous FG :-)
Date:
Fri, 11 Jul 1997 23:03:40 -0400 (EDT)
From:
Orniske@aol.com
To:
wil@wilschock.com


Wil,

What a piece of work! Sorry this took so long, but I've had over a week of
computer
wierdness to settle. I was finally able to view your site with all the bells
and
whistles running, and it is quite entertaining. Have you ever considered
doing
a 'walk through' haunted attraction on your site? 

Elvira is a true winner! We simply must see her in blacklight! If you will
send me some video footage vis VHS (first generation if possible,) I'll
quicktime a short loop for you, and perhaps you can add it to the site (not
sure how much room you have.) Keep the camera rock steady when shooting her
in full motion. I can capture at 30 fps.

I've been away from the list for over a week, but I'll try to be a bit more
prersent
when possible. Be sure to mail me at -> orniske@aol.com <- if you need me in
a
hurry. I am away from the other address for days at a time, lately.

Keep up the great work! I fully expected embellishments to the FG. Would
you
like your FG and Trauma photos included in the book? Let me know.

Sincerely,

-Doug F.


Subject:
Re: Cheaper Motor for FG - analysis
Date:
Sat, 12 Jul 1997 09:55:44 -0700
From:
jeyster@juno.com
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


I picked up one of these motors from C & H, thinking that it would be
great for my FG, however, when I hooked it up, it did not work. Now I
don't know much about motors, but I think this one need a capacitor? I
have noticed in looking at different catalogs that some motors use them.
This motor has four wires coming out of it, a white, black, and two blue
wires. Does anyone know what type of capacitor to use, or what does it
take to make this motor go?
As far as the original question of if this motor would work, I would have
to say yes, just make sure and use the counterweight.

The reason I went with the Granger motor, is that it worked right out of
the box, and also cause it was new. Since the one from C & H is used,
I'm not sure what it was used for, or how long it was in service, so I
went with the new one.

If anyone can tell me how to get the C & H one going, I would appreciate
it, as I'm sure I will find a use for it somewhere.

Jack "Jester" Eyster
jeyster@juno.com


Subject:
Elvira becomes PORTABLE
Date:
Sat, 12 Jul 1997 10:35:02 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


Howdy Howdy Howdy,

Hooooo Hooooo. ;~D

I have redesigned the Floating Ghost. Not HOW it works, but
rather how its constructed.

It all started when I was 9 yrs old and I saw my first dead frog and
...... oh, wrong story.

After seeing the Larry Lund video I have been trying to devise an
easy way to take a Flying Elvira upstairs (not for that, sicko.;~> ) and
have listened to the posts on making free-standing stands for her
(Christopher) and such, (the problem being dragging a 4' square sheet of
plywood upstairs and hanging a 50+ lb monster-contraption to the ceiling
with construction eye bolts that could also be used to pull an engine
from a car) and in twilight sleep this a.m. figured it out. Don't laugh
if this has already been done, since I never heard of it myself and
therefore could not have known.

Here it is.

Instead of using a sheet of plywood, just because you would then have
options on where to put the pullies, build the structure above out of
flat stock steel or aluminum. I plan to use approx. 1 1/4" wide flat
alum. for mine. (Possibly wider if the flex is too much ) Below you will
find the ASCII drawing that should make it somewhat clear.







<--ARM FLAT STOCK AND DISTANCE 40"-->

ARM PULLY BOLT/PIVOT ARM PULLY
/ / /
 / / /         
OIIIIIIIIIIIII[ ]IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIO
I MOTOR FLAT STOCK
I TOTAL LENGTH 20"
O <--MOTOR
I          
I 15 1/2" BETWEEN MOTOR AND HEAD PULLY
I  
O <--HEAD PULLY
            
NOTE; this would be usable for crank lenghts of 14" or less. I
recommend no longer than 10" or 12" myself.)

Entire upper structure should weigh less than 4 lbs (more or less) and
would be supported with three chains; one to each arm point where
pullies are located, one to the head pully and another chain from the
motor that would be attached to same suspension chain as the head chain.
Thus, three lightweight eyehooks in the ceiling and no need for even
hitting studs if you prefer to use molly bolts. (I will be finding studs
myself, in an effort to keep the damage to the ceiling near invisible.)
After use, this baby folds up into a "stick" and stores anywhere.

What do you think?

Wil
 
-- 
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces.

The Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X


Subject:
Re: Elvira becomes PORTABLE
Date:
Sat, 12 Jul 1997 13:08:37 -0700
From:
jeyster@juno.com
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


On Sat, 12 Jul 1997 10:35:02 -0700 "wil@wilschock.com"
 writes:
>Howdy Howdy Howdy,
>
> Hooooo Hooooo. ;~D
>
> I have redesigned the Floating Ghost. Not HOW it works, but
>rather how its constructed.
>

Wil, what a stroke of genius! I like it. When I was first building the
marionette/armature for my ghost, I constructed a T shaped frame out of
some scrap 1x2, so that I could test the movements of the joints. I
didn't have the motor or crank attached, just the strings and pulleys so
that I could pull on them from below. I remember thinking that this was
just a temporary, 2 bit solution until I could get the plywood, so that
it could be properly mounted just like the instructions said. I spent a
week framing the plywood with 1x4's, sanding, filling the cracks and gaps
with wood putty. Then sanding it again, course, medium, and fine. I
wanted it to be perfect. I stopped when I read Bob Andrews post on "It's
Halloween, Not Fine Furniture". I even made that saying into a big sign,
and posted it above my workbench as a reminder for other projects. 
Anyways, I painted it so that I could get it mounted, and let me tell
you, it was a major pain in the *ss to get that sucker up. But with this
method, I think that it would be a breeze to put up and take down.

Oh and by the way, I finally decided that 7 1/2" long crank for my ghost
looks the best to me.

Jack "Jester" Eyster
jeyster@juno.com
  

Subject:
Re: Elvira becomes PORTABLE
Date:
Sat, 12 Jul 1997 20:43:09 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1 , 2


jeyster@juno.com wrote:
>
> On Sat, 12 Jul 1997 10:35:02 -0700 "wil@wilschock.com"
> writes:
> >Howdy Howdy Howdy,
> >
> > Hooooo Hooooo. ;~D
> >
> > I have redesigned the Floating Ghost. Not HOW it works, but
> >rather how its constructed.
> >
>
> Wil, what a stroke of genius! I like it.  
> Oh and by the way, I finally decided that 7 1/2" long crank for my ghost
> looks the best to me.
>
> Jack "Jester" Eyster
> jeyster@juno.com
 

7 1/2", really. That short. Well, like I was telling you, I thought that
the next one I made would have a shorter crank even yet than the 11 1/2"
or so this one has. (At least I think it was 11 1/2") She just moves so
much more gracefully with the shorter distance. Not to mention with far
less strain to the motor. You may be able to use yours without the
counter balance weight now. Did you try this?

Thanks for the good words. I was really jazzed about this when I came up
with it. I stayed in bed in twilight sleep for an extra 30 minutes this
morning untill the actuall design came to me. I was trying to get it
down from three pieces of steel to two and finally did it. Looks pretty
elementary now though.
--
Wil

X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces.

The Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X


Subject:
Re: Elvira becomes PORTABLE
Date:
Sun, 13 Jul 1997 09:23:19 -0700
From:
jeyster@juno.com
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1 , 2


On Sat, 12 Jul 1997 20:43:09 -0700 "wil@wilschock.com"
 writes:

>7 1/2", really. That short. Well, like I was telling you, I thought

Yes 7 1/2" looks the best to me. At this length, she is only rising and
falling 15", which to me makes her look like she is just hovering.  

>less strain to the motor. You may be able to use yours without the
>counter balance weight now. Did you try this?

No, I am still using the counter balance due to the additional weight I
have added. I used chicken wire to give her body and arms some depth. I
have also added a wig so as to give her some hair, so with all this
additional weight, I still need the counter balance. I made the counter
balance out of a coffee can so that I could add and remove sand as
needed. You may be asking why did I go the the trouble of adding the wig
and chicken wire? It's because of the wig head that I found for her.
This head had a plastic face mask of a woman covering the front half of
the styrofoam head piece, so I wanted to make my ghost beautiful,
feminine if you will. I probably would have made her more scary, or gory
if I was using one of the typical face-less heads


>down from three pieces of steel to two and finally did it. Looks
>pretty
>elementary now though.

I have some angle iron, the kind that has holes and slots in them for
making your own shelving units, and I think that this material would be
perfect. Let me know what you come up with. 

Jack "Jester" Eyster
jeyster@juno.com


Subject:
Re: Elvira becomes PORTABLE
Date:
Sun, 13 Jul 1997 22:41:10 -0400
From:
Silvia
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


>
> Here it is.
>
> Instead of using a sheet of plywood, just because you would then have
>options on where to put the pullies, build the structure above out of
>flat stock steel or aluminum. I plan to use approx. 1 1/4" wide flat
>alum. for mine. (Possibly wider if the flex is too much ) Below you will
>find the ASCII drawing that should make it somewhat clear.
>

>
>
>
><--ARM FLAT STOCK AND DISTANCE 40"-->
>
> ARM PULLY BOLT/PIVOT ARM PULLY
> / / /
> / / /
>OIIIIIIIIIIIII[ ]IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIO
> I MOTOR FLAT STOCK
> I TOTAL LENGTH 20"
> O <--MOTOR
> I
> I 15 1/2" BETWEEN MOTOR AND HEAD PULLY
> I
> O <--HEAD PULLY
>
> NOTE; this would be usable for crank lenghts of 14" or less. I
>recommend no longer than 10" or 12" myself.)
>
Sounds good Will I used a similar setup on my PVC stand it really does cut
down on weight.

Christopher
isolated looney



Subject:
Re: Elvira becomes PORTABLE
Date:
Mon, 14 Jul 1997 21:28:22 -0500
From:
Dan.Oelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


Good idea - I really like this more portable Floating Ghost.

Why not use L-shapped aluminum instead of flat stock?
You can probably get away with smaller pieces and
have less flex. Note that you should fold it all up, clamp
the pieces and then drill your center pivot hole. This will
make sure that the vertical part of your L-shapped pieces don't
create problems as you fold it up.

[...]
> Instead of using a sheet of plywood, just because you would then have
> options on where to put the pullies, build the structure above out of
> flat stock steel or aluminum. I plan to use approx. 1 1/4" wide flat
> alum. for mine. (Possibly wider if the flex is too much ) Below you will
> find the ASCII drawing that should make it somewhat clear.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <--ARM FLAT STOCK AND DISTANCE 40"-->
>
> ARM PULLY BOLT/PIVOT ARM PULLY
> / / /
> / / /         
> OIIIIIIIIIIIII[ ]IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIO
> I MOTOR FLAT STOCK
> I TOTAL LENGTH 20"
> O <--MOTOR
> I          
> I 15 1/2" BETWEEN MOTOR AND HEAD PULLY
> I  
> O <--HEAD PULLY
>             
[...]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Oelke - droelke@aud.alcatel.com Alcatel Telecom, Richardson, TX

"I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues"        
- The Lorax by Dr. Suess


Subject:
Re: Elvira becomes PORTABLE
Date:
Mon, 14 Jul 1997 20:39:15 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


Daniel R. Oelke wrote:
>
> Good idea - I really like this more portable Floating Ghost.
>
> Why not use L-shapped aluminum instead of flat stock?
> You can probably get away with smaller pieces and
> have less flex. Note that you should fold it all up, clamp
> the pieces and then drill your center pivot hole. This will
> make sure that the vertical part of your L-shapped pieces don't
> create problems as you fold it up.
 
> Dan Oelke

I can see what you're referring to and think that would be a good idea.
You're talking about facing the angle the same way and using three
pieces so it will fully fold up. Very nice. One step further yet. I like
it.

Wil
--
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces.

The Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X


Subject:
Re: Elvira becomes PORTABLE
Date:
Wed, 16 Jul 1997 23:42:20 -0600 (CST)
From:
DWFWW@jazz.ucc.uno.edu
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


I thought I ought to add my tow cents' worth, as the designer of the original.
;-)

Any means of simplifying the motor platform of the FG is a big bonus!
The reason I suggested wood from the get-go was that it is easier for a
novice to deal with it. The metal frame idea is a real plus, for those
who can deal with constructing it.

Frankly, the basic idea of the FG lends itself to any number of applications,
and I am just waiting for someone to suggest an application for a dual-motor
rig (I have one in mind for use in the book already.)

One other thing - the wood-base, simple armature version proved itself in
running kink-free for literally thousands of hours in a store window. That's
why I didn't include the fancy alternatives that are possible in the
basic instructions. Yes - the display ran overnight in a store window,
unattended, and never produced a fire risk or bind-up failure! You can
see why I recommend it - specified Dayton gearmotor and all! :-)

Geez - it's late, and my 'dystypea' is showing. 'tow' above should read: 'two.'

Keep 'em flying!

-Doug F.



(use the 'orniske' address to get a quicker response.)

Subject:
Re: FG animation
Date:
Fri, 01 Aug 1997 17:06:57 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


Jim Kadel wrote:
>
> >http://www.silcom.com/~crafters/elvira.htm These are fairly
> exhaustive
> >plan addendums so its worth your time to check it out.
>
> Wil,
>
> Thanks. Have of course checked yours and the Archives for what they
> contain.
> I was looking for a little unpublished "expertise" from those with
> experience.
>
> My idea:
> Use as a crank a plexiglass wheel of 12" diameter (for short "throw").
>
> The motor side to be an enclosed wood box, inside painted flat black.
> In addition to the motor a fluorescent black light is installed with a
> rectangular plastic window to let the UV light pass downward thru the
> plexiglass crank, illuminating the ghost.
>
> A sector (section) of the plexiglass wheel (crank) will be painted
> black to prevent UV light passage.
>
> The idea is to have a FG that appears and disappears as it moves.
>
> Jim


Really cool idea Jim. I think to effect this though your wheel would
have to be bigger than 12" so that your light could be further in front
of the marionette, but then again maybe not. I like it.

--
Wil
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces
Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X




Subject:
Re: FG animation
Date:
Fri, 01 Aug 1997 17:29:09 -0400
From:
Jim Kadel
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


>http://www.silcom.com/~crafters/elvira.htm These are fairly exhaustive
>plan addendums so its worth your time to check it out.

Wil,

Thanks. Have of course checked yours and the Archives for what they contain.
I was looking for a little unpublished "expertise" from those with experience.

My idea:
Use as a crank a plexiglass wheel of 12" diameter (for short "throw").

The motor side to be an enclosed wood box, inside painted flat black. In addition to the motor a fluorescent black light is installed with a rectangular plastic window to
let the UV light pass downward thru the plexiglass crank, illuminating the ghost.

A sector (section) of the plexiglass wheel (crank) will be painted black to prevent UV light passage.

The idea is to have a FG that appears and disappears as it moves.

Jim


^^^^^^^^^^^
Jim Kadel
mailto:jimk@rica.net
Haunt Master Products, Inc
http://members.aol.com/hmpi
^^^^^^^^^^^

Subject:
Re: FG animation
Date:
Wed, 6 Aug 1997 12:55:47 -0700
From:
jeyster@juno.com
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


On Fri, 01 Aug 1997 11:00:36 -0700 "wil@wilschock.com"
writes:

> Motor speed looks great from 6 to 10 RPM, we already know. Doug
>recommends 13" to 18" of crank length I think. I recommend more like
>10"
>or 11". I spoke to Jester about this while he was in the process of
>making one and I think he said he went shorter even yet after
>extensive
>playing with a crank arm that started long but had a bunch of holes
>drilled in it all up and down. All he had to do was slip the gang bolt
>into each hole and watch her fly. I'm sure he will let us know as soon

Hi Wil and everyone else, sorry for the delay in getting back on this
subject, I've been on Catalina Island for the last 4 days celebrating our
12th wedding aniversary. Needless to say, I'm trying to catch-up on 400+
 messages that came in while I was away. Anywho, back to the subject at
hand, I have my crank at 8 1/2 inches, which in turn gives my ghost a
rise and fall of 17 inches. I found that anything longer, didn't look
realistic to me. I did originally make my crank 12 1/2 inches, and I
drilled holes every 1 inch so that I could try different lengths. 

Now I did come up with an ideal that may look really cool with the FG,
and that is placing a large tombstone in front of her on the ground, thus
making it appear that he/she/it is rising from the grave. I think that
if I was to do this, I would want a long crank arm, possibly 18 to 24
inches. I might just try this for next year.

Hope this helps.

Jack "Jester" Eyster
jeyster@juno.com


Subject:
Re: Mrs. Lamar
Date:
Tue, 19 Aug 1997 22:50:33 -0700
From:
jeyster@juno.com
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


On Tue, 19 Aug 1997 23:41:17 -0400 Silvia writes:
>and was not happy with her movement. My crank was about 13" and this
>needs

Hi Christopher, I have the crank for my FG at 7 1/2", and I feel that
this looks the best to me.

>to be shortened. The movement of the arms seems unatural to me. I used
>the
>coat hanger set up as Doug outlined, but the arms seem to just wave in
>all
>different directions. Wil what type of joints does Elvira have? Maybe

How far apart are your arms? I have mine 30" apart, and they are 27" in
front of the pulley that the head is attached to. As far as the joints
for the arms, I used the same method as outlined in the instructions, and
they seem to be fine.

Jack "Jester" Eyster
jeyster@juno.com

Subject:
Re: Mrs. Lamar
Date:
Tue, 19 Aug 1997 23:09:06 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


Silvia wrote:
>
> Hi gang I wanted to thank everyone for the sugestions on lighting my grave
> yard.
> I have Mrs.Lamar (FG) together. I turned her on for the first time tonight
> and was not happy with her movement. My crank was about 13" and this needs
> to be shortened. The movement of the arms seems unatural to me. I used the
> coat hanger set up as Doug outlined, but the arms seem to just wave in all
> different directions. Wil what type of joints does Elvira have? Maybe I
> just need to adjust her a little more. Please take a look at her.
> http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Lofts/9860/Mrsl.gif
> I also need to paint her so she reacts to black light. I want her to glow
> white or blue and I know Woolite does this. Has anyone tried to paint with
> this? Does is work like a paint or just make a mess. Not sure if it will
> stick to her head because it is covered with a shinny coating.
> Also does the glow in the dark spray paint glow in black light or just by
> charging in regular light?
>
> Christopher
> isolated looney


Chris,

Your effort on Mrs. Lamar is really nice. I know when you get her
makup on and painted you will be really happy with her. (The makeup will
be the fun part!) It almost looks as though her upper arms are bound by
her robe. These need to be completely free. Otherwise I'm sure you'll
experience a major jerky movement pattern. I like how your shoulders on
her are not too wide--this is a common miscalculation. My skeleton is
just short lengths of wire the same as my human skeleton, with eyes
connecting the ends of each wire. There are shoulders, upper arms and
lower arms as well as breasts. No further body. The length of your crank
in my humble opinion is far too long. Shorten that to 11 or even 9 and I
think you'll see a hovering effect that has a chilling realism. Also, I
think judging from the picture, your pullies are slightly too wide above
her hands. What is the dimension between these?

 The fluorescent paints you are talking about will not give you the
effect you want I believe. If you are trying for a white or blue, the
only color I know you can use is white. A light coat of white will give
a blueish white and a little heavier you have a beautiful purple. I
really prefer white (for etherial) and black (for blood) under the black
lights for erie realism. But that's just my opinion. The flouscent
paints are extremely brash flourescence under the black light. I did use
some green with good results, but not a lot. Yellow, by the way, looks
exactly the same to me as the green does.

 On the outisde chance you haven't visited my Elvira pages, you may want
to take a look. Too bad you're not coming to the seminar next week. You
could take a close look at mine and Jester's FC skeletons.

Wil
--
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces.

The Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X

Subject:
Re: Mr.Lamar
Date:
Fri, 29 Aug 1997 10:27:42 -0400
From:
Jim Kadel
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


Wil et other interested folksies,

As I consulted with Chris, I know that the motors used were indeed $7.95 and were purchased from: C & H Sales Co. (800-325-9465)
The gear motor's stock # is ACGM8853
Specs are: 120 vac 60 hz 0.12 amp 5 rpm 150 oz-in (max. torque)

I believe that the topic of this motor was brought up a month or two back and that others (sorry can't remember who) confirmed that it quite viable for use as a FG
motor. Because of the cost difference between $40. vs $8, I'm kinda surprised this didn't gain more attention by ye olde frugal types :>

Jim
======================= REF =============================
At 11:58 PM 8/28/97 -0400, Chris Silvia wrote:
>All the motors I used in Mr. Lamar are those $7.95 jobs from I think All >Electronics. This is the same motor I used for my FG and it works great at 5rpm.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Jim Kadel
mailto:jimk@rica.net
Haunt Master Products, Inc
http://members.aol.com/hmpi
^^^^^^^^^^^

Subject:
Floating Ghost Motors for $8
Date:
Fri, 29 Aug 1997 11:08:05 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


Jim Kadel wrote:
>
> Wil et other interested folksies,
>
> As I consulted with Chris, I know that the motors used were indeed
> $7.95 and were purchased from: C & H Sales Co. (800-325-9465)
> The gear motor's stock # is ACGM8853
> Specs are: 120 vac 60 hz 0.12 amp 5 rpm 150 oz-in (max. torque)
>
> I believe that the topic of this motor was brought up a month or two
> back and that others (sorry can't remember who) confirmed that it
> quite viable for use as a FG motor. Because of the cost difference
> between $40. vs $8, I'm kinda surprised this didn't gain more
> attention by ye olde frugal types :>
>
> Jim

Jim,

This is really hot news for those wanting to do a FG! What a boone. I
am reading about this motor now as I type. This is a MOLON motor, which
runs at 8 RPM without load and 5 RPM under @150 oz-in load. The only
potential problem I can see is if it gets hot under the load of a full
sized FG and burn up, and the 1/2" long shaft.

Chris,

According to the pics on Mrs. Lamar, it looks like this one is a very
heavy FG. How does the motor fare driving this much weight? Also, what
length of crank arm are you using to move it? Also, how did you mount
this so that 1/2" length shaft would work for you? One more question;
how loud / quiet does this run?(not that it is that big of a deal, just
curious)

Am I jazzed. 5 RPM would likely be an _excellent_ speed for these
things, especially with say a 7" crank length. I'll be getting this
ordered immediately and posting the info on C & H for everyone below.
Now I'll need to see how to use these for the arm movements and head
movements of robotic dummies! (This would be a direct hint to Chris and
Jim.)

C and H Sales Company
P.O. Box 5356
Pasadena Ca. 91117-9988
(800) 325-9465

5 RPM MOLON AC 120 VAC Gearhead Motor
Item Stock No#ACGM8853
Price $7.95
C and H minimum order $30.00, orders blow this are charged $5.00 extra
for handling. Cash or credit card orders only, no C.O.D.

Thanks Jim and Christopher for the skinny on this!

--
Wil
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces
Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X


Subject:
Re: Floating Ghost Motors for $8
Date:
Fri, 29 Aug 1997 16:46:39 -0400
From:
Jim Kadel
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


Wil,

I don't think overheat is a problem, check w Chris to be sure as he has one
operating. The shaft length is no problem with ye olde (feeling old English today) shaft extender or shaft coupling.
C & H has a coupling that fits the 5/16 inch shaft. Stock # CO8851 $3.49
Others carry shaft extenders for this size shaft. Jameco carries same for instance. They're cheaper than couplings.

Jim
================ REF
>The only potential problem I can see is if it gets hot under the load of a full
>sized FG and burn up, and the 1/2" long shaft.
=========================
^^^^^^^^^^^
Jim Kadel
mailto:jimk@rica.net
Haunt Master Products, Inc
http://members.aol.com/hmpi
^^^^^^^^^^^

Subject:
Re: Floating Ghost Motors for $8
Date:
Fri, 29 Aug 1997 15:46:49 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


Jim Kadel wrote:
>
> Wil,
>
> I don't think overheat is a problem, check w Chris to be sure as he
> has one
> operating. The shaft length is no problem with ye olde (feeling old
> English today) shaft extender or shaft coupling.
> C & H has a coupling that fits the 5/16 inch shaft. Stock # CO8851
> $3.49
> Others carry shaft extenders for this size shaft. Jameco carries same
> for instance. They're cheaper than couplings.
>
> Jim

 
Very good idea, that would do it alright. I will make a note of the
coupler.

Jester just e mailed me that he has one of these motors and it has to
be wired with a capacitor or something, but he doesn't have one. Can you
tell me about this, and whether we could get one of the capacitors
easily? He plans to bring this up to the seminar on Sunday and it would
be nice to hook one up.

Wil
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces
Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X


Subject:
Elvira Becomes PORTABLE
Date:
Tue, 02 Sep 1997 16:44:49 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


Howdy Howdy Howdy,

This is just a quick note before posting the rundown on the seminar
(wow, get to that already whydon'tcha?) to let you all in on the latest
on the collapsable FG.

The idea was presented here on the list in July by myself for using
aluminum framwork for Doug Ferguson's Floating Ghost, listed under
"Elvira Becomes Portable". So far this has been a theory that would
recreate the ease of use of the FG, should it really work out. Well,
Sunday the Portable Elvira came to life before all and the thing does
work. Dwayne brought along a 4' x 4' sheet of ply to make a FG there,
using the spacing dimensions for the pullies we had, along with a dozen
other little things that make building one far easier. Also, Jester
brought along some angle iron with hopes to make a version of the FG
using part of my theory as well. (Wow, you should see his ghost he
brought up to show off. Very nice.) Yet after seeing the Portable Elvira
Floating Ghost, neither one decided to make one out of these mediums. Let
me fill you in.

By starting with a single piece of 1" angle aluminum 60" long, cut
three pieces 20". Then you will need to round one end of all three of
these, allowing for a pivot action. Now set all three pieces one on top
of the other with the rounded ends all lining up and drill one 1/4" hole
down through them to allow you to insert a 1/4" x 3/4" bolt through and
spin a wing nut onto the threads.
     
/o\
/ I \ 
/ I \
/ I \
/ I \
I
 
 Now all three pieces should spread out like a fan to a three point
framework. (NOTE; This does not work by folding one leg out from the
left and one from the right untill making the T shown below. To allow it
to fully collapse you must fan out the bottom two legs clear around to
make the ultimate T shape.


---------------o----------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

The piece pointing down represents the very top of the three (as
stacked) and also the angle you will attach the motor to 14" away from
the back, or 6" from the front. Simply attach the motor with two of the
motor mounts, which is sufficient for such light duty. 

---------------o----------------
I
I
---     
Motor--> I I ---------
--- ^
I I
I 14" ON CENTER
I ^
I ---------

Now simply attach the pullies to the underneath side of the framework,
one at each end of the three. Use this with approximately a 7 to no
longer than an 8 inch crank, and you have it. When you loosen one
wingnut the entire thing collapses to the size of something you can
almost fit in a glove compartment and weighs ounces more than just the
motor itself. 

 I will be following this up with actual photgraphs and instructions on
how to make your own Portable Elvira Floating Ghost in the future, but in
the down and dirty fifty-something days and counting from now to H, I
thought I'd get up at least this much on it now. For the nuances of
making a FG, please go to my website that covers making the more
stationary version at;

http://www.deathlord.net  

and follow the link to Elvira the Floating Ghost. Allow some time for my
main page to load, as my site is very graphic.

 E me if I can help make this cleared for you.  


--
Wil
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces
Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X


Subject:
Re: 1000 Pardons
Date:
Sun, 7 Sep 1997 23:42:00 -0400 (EDT)
From:
Orniske@aol.com
To:
wil@wilschock.com


Wil,

I read your letter of September 5, and I have to admit that I had missed the
thread of posts that led to it. I have been rather selective in my reading
of
posts from chatlist lately, due to limits on my time, and thus wasn't
aware
that I had missed anything. After backtracking, I am ready to reply.

First of all, I never had any problems with your representation of the FG.
You credited me in numerous places on your site, and that's all anyone could
ask. 

I never expected to keep the ownership of this effect to myself. I
intended to share it, and have others like yourself add to its legacy.
Over a hundred versions have already been built. I have watched the
memos from new builders arrive on the list since I introduced it over a
year ago. And here's the thing - no two of them are the same. Like a
magician performing the cups and balls, no two imagineers do the FG
quite the same way.

Admittedly, I had a tinge of jealousy when I first saw others adapting it
freely, but within a few minutes, I realized that this was a miniature
of the same emotion that a father has when his daughter begins a life of
her own with a stranger. She may be his daughter, but she must also
have a life of her own if others are to truly love her.

In the magic community, concerning the of the origins of effects, it is
simply expected that one who adds to an effect not claim its origin as
himself/herself. The innovator merely signs his name, and offers
the original inventor a credit. Effects like this aren't usually patented
by small inventors like ourselves, who lack the wherewithal to hire lawyers
and professionals, and don't wish to wait years to release the effect to the
public. 

I hold no patent on the device. In fact, the mechanism for the FG may
be covered under another patent I am unaware of. Thus, anyone who wants
to sell this effect commercially will have to do the patent searches in
order to be legal. I simply don't have the time to research it. All I
can say it that I did invent my particular use for a turning crank and
three offset lines. I am writing a book about my methods, but this does
not grant me manufacturing rights, technically.

As a hobbyist, I love doing this sort of 'folk invention' - and I think
it's the best kind, and the most fun. When I see others using it to enrich
our favorite holiday, it makes me proud. This is how you and I (and others)
can help to elevate those simple, folksy front yard displays into something
really special. If the average borderline Halloween decorator adds only one
new effect a year, their little haunt will grow slowly - until the fever
_really_ hits, and they become imagineers instead of mere prop setters.

If you look at the phenomenal growth of the list over the past year, I think
you'll agree that it's working. Keep it up, and you'll have your wish
eventually.

---
                                     
I'd be happy if you'd add a link back to my site from the Elvira adaptation
of the FG, but I suspect there's already one installed. You know that I
have
a link to your site, as well. I have no grief with anyone who builds and
shares
their version of my mechanisms, and I make no pretense that mine are the best
versions, or the only ones worth considering. I want to sell books, too,
but it's not the primary reason I'm here...

Ghouls just want to have fun. :-)


-Doug


Subject:
Re: Candelabra
Date:
Wed, 10 Sep 1997 14:26:49 -0400
From:
Jim Kadel
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


Wil,

Is this $90 cost with a $40 motor or the $8 motor?

Jim
========================= REF =======================
At 10:37 AM 9/10/97 -0700, Wil wrote regarding building of a FG:
>But I will state right now that I could do the entire event from start to finish in about two hours (I would include
the other hour for the animatronic and the
>fluorescent painting of it) at a total cost of $90.00. This would
>include all hardware, frame, animatronic, paint, blacklight and motor and
>zip cord.
===================================
^^^^^^^^^^^
Jim Kadel
mailto:jimk@rica.net
Haunt Master Products, Inc
http://members.aol.com/hmpi
^^^^^^^^^^^

Subject:
GearMotors
Date:
Wed, 10 Sep 1997 17:42:32 -0700
From:
Zombie
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


Hey all,

Has anyone heard of or used a 6rpm gearmotor from Cramer Company. I
found them listed at Digikey. They are only $26.22. I have a pic with specs
if anyone is interested.


Zombie
curtis@ridgenet.net


Subject:
$8 FG motor...revisited
Date:
Thu, 11 Sep 1997 22:04:42 -0500
From:
"Norm"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist


Got 3 of those $8 motors in today. Also got some shaft couplings as well.
what a bargain!
Jim Kadel sent me the .bmp for the wire hookup of this motor, but I have
one question. What type of fuse should I use? Everything else is pretty
much self explanatory...Jim??? anyone??? Bueller??

Wil, hurry up with the portable Elvira stuff! Please post this on your
site since Alabama is soooo far away from California. Can't make any of
your workshops. By the way, ever though about a North American tour? You
can visit all the list member cities and make the world a happier place.


Norm
batesy@datasync.com

Subject:
C&H 5rpm motor test
Date:
Wed, 17 Sep 1997 16:49:34 EDT
From:
jeyster@juno.com (Jack Eyster)
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


We were discussing the C&H motor on the chat last night, and I plugged
mine in and ran it for 3 1/2 hrs, without any load on it. The motor
seemed to run ok, and it appeared to have the same amount of tork as when
I first started it up. It didn't seem to be any noisier than when I
first started it, to when I finally shut it off. It did get extremely
hot after about 15 mins of running, I couldn't even touch it. I would
highly advise using a desk top, or some other type of fan with this motor
for added cooling, and I would only mount this motor on a metal type of
frame, like the portable version of the FG that Wil has created. I
would not mount this on wood, or use it in a small enclosed area.

I plan on hooking this motor up again when I get home from work, and
running it for about 6 hours with a 1 lb load on it, and I will report on
how that goes.

Jack "Jester" Eyster
jeyster@juno.com
jeyster@gte.net
 



Subject:
Re: Color organ?
Date:
Thu, 18 Sep 1997 22:14:25 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


> I was thinking of something a little more (I don't know...complex, more
> options, better, sturdier...) than that tiny little thing they list in the
> catalog.
> Maybe its not necessary... color organs are another topic with which I am
> woefully ignorant.
>
> Tim Branan
> branan@aramat.com


 Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the LED eyes for the FG Doug
Ferguson has posted use the same basic setup as this? This may not
strain (dither) the decible level, but it does work similar. Perhaps
this could be used in a simple but effective thunder application.

Or not.

Wil
--
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces.

The Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X

Subject:
Re: Color organ?
Date:
Fri, 19 Sep 1997 15:14:15 -0400 (EDT)
From:
Orniske@aol.com
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


Wil wrote:

>Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the LED eyes for the FG Doug
>Ferguson has posted use the same basic setup as this?

It's certainly not mine originally. It's just the oft-used notion of a
threshhold detector flashing a light. Doing it with a color organ (indirect
trigger) or a LED (via a direct trigger, as I do in the FG head) are just
two methods that
achieve similar results. (The color organ adds an additional channel of
trigger,
to boot.)

Having two channels really adds to the possibilities of controlling a room's
show
cheaply. Consider this setup with dual color organs and a stereo cassette
deck
running a loop tape:

You'll need two synthesizers of some kind, or four audio oscillators to
program the setup. You'll use one low and one high tone on each of the
2 stereo channels available, and each channel will run a separate color
organ.
You'll have to modify your color organ such that you can feed line-level
audio into it, bypassing the microphone. You will need to experiment with the
tones to see what is needed to activate the high-frequency sensing circuitry
without triggering the low-frequency side, and vice-versa. 
What's neat about this system is that it's analog, and you can program the
intensity of any lighting connected to one of the 4 outputs simply
by changing the volume (amplitude) of the tone feeding it.

Admittedly, programming is a little bit of work. You have to feed all
four tones on the fly as you go, since most all cassette decks record both
tracks at once. This might best be done by two people, one playing each
keyboard, or each taking two oscillators to control. Write the time cues
down in advance, and rehearse the sequence before recording the tones.

If your computer has audio editing capabilities, the task will
be much easier. On a computer editor, simply open four tracks (2 to
output left, and 2 to output right,) and use the software's tone generation
feature to create appropriate trigger tones at the time cue points you
choose.
Afterward, simply runn this out to a loop tape (or whatever.)

This would offer enough control to do a major lighting change, and offer
spot cues within a one-room show. If you are lucky enough to have a 4-track
cassette system (the ones aimed at home composers,) you can really get fancy,
by having a double system, and 8 control lines.

Some of the earliest Disney animatronics used a more sophisticated tone
trigger
method called Frequency Shift Keying (FSK,) then a relatively new NASA
technology.
It was put to use in the Carousel of Progress attraction, and used sprocketed
magnetic tape for synchronization. The imagineers could fit a larger number
of cues per audio track, but the basic principle was the same.

-Doug



Subject:
C&H Sales FG motor
Date:
Thu, 18 Sep 1997 22:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:
Dave Bell
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


Hey all:

I can't find my &*(%^* C&H Sales catalog, and I can't find
the earlier postings that gave their part number for that
5 RPM motor with capacitor!

Help?

Dave


Subject:
Re: C&H Sales FG motor
Date:
Fri, 19 Sep 1997 11:09:53 -0700
From:
kmw
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


Dave Bell wrote:
>
> Hey all:
>
> I can't find my &*(%^* C&H Sales catalog, and I can't find
> the earlier postings that gave their part number for that
> 5 RPM motor with capacitor!
>
> Help?
>
> Dave
#ACGM8853 - 5RPM MOLON MOTOR - $7.95 ea.
#CO8851 - 5/16" SHAFT COUPLER - $3.49 ea.
--
°Sorceress°

§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§
There is Magick all around us!
¤¤¤
For everthing that happens,
there is a purpose.
The wise will seek that purpose.
§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§

Subject:
Portable Elvira
Date:
Wed, 24 Sep 1997 16:31:58 -0700
From:
Zombie
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


Anthony,

I need more info on the Dayton motor you used for your Portable Elvira
you built with Wil last weekend. He told us on the chat that he thought is
was a Dayton 27807C that you paid $28 for. The closest I could find
Grainger's online catalog was a 2Z807 12rpm ac gearmotor. It wholesales for
$40.90. Would they be one in the same? Any additional info would be
helpful as I am ready to buy the 12 rpm motor you used. I'm building my
portable FG this weekend and need a motor!!

Thanks in advance,

Zombie
curtis@ridgenet.net



Subject:
Re: Portable Elvira
Date:
Mon, 29 Sep 1997 02:03:53 -0400 (EDT)
From:
AS69911@aol.com
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


Very quiet. I cannot compair to others because this it the only one I use.
 Wil should be able to give you his opinion. He has another model, and he
heard mine. I think you would find the dayton perfect for the Portable
Ghost.

Subject:
Re: Portable Elvira
Date:
Sun, 28 Sep 1997 23:06:01 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


> > has 12 rpm, and 25.7 torque. It worked very well at wil's house last
> > weekend. I purchased the motor at "graingers". I got a really good
> price at
> > the time, I think about $30.00
> >
> > Anthony.
> > as69911@aol.com
>
> How loud is this motor?
>
> Steven
> stevendelacy@thegrid.net




Its quiet. Of the motors I've seen, this one has the great features of
having plenty of power to work without the counter weight, which means
that the portable FG, or the FG Lite (someone offered this last Tues.
on chat). The portable, or Lite doesn't lend itself to the fourth pully
since the motor and head pully are line of sight. The motor also stays
really cool under full load. So while it is 12 RPM, and a bit slower
would be a bit better, the speed it moves at is very attractive, and the
Lite version is worth the sacrifice times two.

Wil

--
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces.

The Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X


Subject:
Re: Sunday at wil's house.
Date:
Sun, 28 Sep 1997 23:13:29 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


AS69911@aol.com wrote:
>
> Wil, I want again thank you very much for the help in building the "elvira".
> She is unbelievable. For those on the list that do not know Wil had me over
> this last sunday. We took a trip to the flea market where wil purchased a
> nice chandelier. We then had a nice breakfast. It was then time for the
> grand tour at Wil's house. I was amazed at everything Wil had made. He is
> truly remarkable. His "elvira" Grand entrance, TCT and Coffin coronary are a
> must see to appeciate sights.
>
> Wil after giving me the tour, directed (actually built) another "elvira". It
> looks just as great at the original. The portable "elvira" is just that.
> After building the item, and breaking it down it fits almost anywhere.
>
> Thank You again Wil I had a great time and learned alot. Hope to see you
> again soon when I go back and see the relatives. (don't forget about the
> halloween party)


You're welcome Anthony. I had a good time as well and was excited to
see the second generation portable or FG Lite. The quieter motor, the
marionette with larger breasts for more dimension, the 1" angle
alumuminum.... I learned a LOT. I am glad we did it. Be sure to pass on
what you saw, as others are having a hard time envisioning the portable
version that makes what was once 40 pounds into just under 5. I hope to
have some pics up on her within two weeks. A savvy guy or ghoul could
still make her before H.

Wil
--
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces.

The Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X

Subject:
RE: Sunday at wil's house.
Date:
Tue, 30 Sep 1997 11:51:14 -0400
From:
Lisa Meinders - IA
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
"'chatlist@netcom.com'"


She's beautiful!!!! I had built my FG with a skulls face with LED
eyes, but I totally like the look of the wig foam head painted. Great
Job!

Vamp
v---v

>----------
>From: AS69911@aol.com[SMTP:AS69911@aol.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 1997 1:24 AM
>To: chatlist@netcom.com
>Subject: Re: Sunday at wil's house.
>
>Wil's web site for the "elvira" http://www.deathlord.net
>

Subject:
Re: Sunday at wil's house.
Date:
Tue, 30 Sep 1997 10:47:47 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


Lisa Meinders - IA wrote:
>
> She's beautiful!!!! I had built my FG with a skulls face with LED
> eyes, but I totally like the look of the wig foam head painted. Great
> Job!
>
> Vamp
> v---v
>
> >----------
> >From: AS69911@aol.com[SMTP:AS69911@aol.com]
> >Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 1997 1:24 AM
> >To: chatlist@netcom.com
> >Subject: Re: Sunday at wil's house.
> >
> >Wil's web site for the "elvira" http://www.deathlord.net
> >


Thank you. Gosh. I like her too. In fact I hate to put her up. Hanging
around in the garage just spruces up the place don't cha know.

Speaking of Elvira. Does anyone know where I can get an Elvira latex
mask to make a dummy out of? I was thinking of putting one of those huge
tits chests on the dummy, a nice witches dress and then tie her up to a
stake. Maybe some flames licking up from below using a box fan and
colored plastic flames lighted with red and yellow spots. I also have a
christmas tree motorized stand that would work perfectly to stick the
stake in and then the whole thing could slowly turn as she burns
alive....

 
--
Wil
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces
Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X

Subject:
FG Motor
Date:
Tue, 30 Sep 1997 16:58:51 EDT
From:
dwmcloda@MIT.EDU
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


Is there an easy way to adapt
a 36 rpm gear motor to an FG?
_______________________________________________
David McLoda Massachusetts Institute of Technology
530 Beacon St. Phi Kappa Sigma
Boston, MA 02215 http://web.mit.edu/dwmcloda/www/
(617) 536-3683
dwmcloda@mit.edu
_________________________________________________

Subject:
Re: FG Motor
Date:
Tue, 30 Sep 1997 18:32:37 -0400
From:
Jim Kadel
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


David,

Perhaps a lamp dimmer could slow it to something reasonable?
Otherwise, a pulley system with a 3:1 or 4:1 speed reduction ratio would work.

Jim
================== REF
At 04:58 PM 9/30/97 EDT, you wrote:
>Is there an easy way to adapt
>a 36 rpm gear motor to an FG?
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>David McLoda Massachusetts Institute of Technology
>530 Beacon St. Phi Kappa Sigma
>Boston, MA 02215 http://web.mit.edu/dwmcloda/www/
>(617) 536-3683
>dwmcloda@mit.edu
==============
^^^^^^^^^^^
Jim Kadel
mailto:jimk@rica.net
Haunt Master Products, Inc
http://members.aol.com/hmpi
^^^^^^^^^^^

Subject:
Re: FG Motor
Date:
Tue, 30 Sep 1997 17:01:21 -0700
From:
"wil@wilschock.com"
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
To:
chatlist@netcom.com
References:
1


dwmcloda@MIT.EDU wrote:
>
> Is there an easy way to adapt
> a 36 rpm gear motor to an FG?

> David McLoda                  

No problem. Just fit your Floating Ghost with jogging shoes.

--
Wil
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X
Rest In Pieces
Death Lord
'97 chatlist Topic Archives;
http://www.deathlord.net
X+X+X+X+X+X+X+X

Subject:
FG idea
Date:
Mon, 06 Oct 1997 01:42:30
From:
grey@ionet.net (Michael DuBois)
Reply-To:
chatlist@netcom.com
Organization:
None (Michael DuBois, Phoenix, AZ USA)
To:
chatlist@netcom.com


Has anyone tried to give a Crank Ghost a glowing heart, like the one that the bride
has during the Haunted Mansion ride at Disney Land ? Would it give off too much red
light ? Too heavy ?

I'm a bad, bad boy... I video taped a few of their (Disneys') rides when I was there
a few years ago... Haunted Mansion... Pirates of the Caribbean...
No one said anything... (I didn't use a light though) Makes for some great inspiration
to give things that pe